From dd188234669d06cdceae6aa1545e2dddb5e97dff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jonastheis <mail@jonastheis.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:16:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Clean up tangle tests
---
dapps/valuetransfers/packages/tangle/tangle_test.go | 11 +----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dapps/valuetransfers/packages/tangle/tangle_test.go b/dapps/valuetransfers/packages/tangle/tangle_test.go
index b7dc5a90..e423e4ba 100644
--- a/dapps/valuetransfers/packages/tangle/tangle_test.go
+++ b/dapps/valuetransfers/packages/tangle/tangle_test.go
@@ -31,15 +31,6 @@ func TestSetTransactionPreferred(t *testing.T) {
assert.True(t, modified)
}
-func TestPropagateValuePayloadLikeUpdates(t *testing.T) {
-
-}
-
-//TODO: missing propagateValuePayloadConfirmedUpdates (not yet implemented)
-
-func TestSetTransactionFinalized(t *testing.T) {
-}
-
// TestBookTransaction tests the following cases:
// - missing output
// - transaction already booked by another process
@@ -491,7 +482,7 @@ func TestStoreTransactionModels(t *testing.T) {
})
// check created consumers
- // TODO: only reason that there could be multiple consumers = conflict, e.g. 2 tx use same inputs?
+ // only reason that there could be multiple consumers = conflict, e.g. 2 tx use same inputs?
tx.Inputs().ForEach(func(inputId transaction.OutputID) bool {
expectedConsumer := NewConsumer(inputId, tx.ID())
tangle.Consumers(inputId).Consume(func(consumer *Consumer) {
--
GitLab